WALKER, LAWRENCE J. The Sequentiality of Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1982, 53, 1330-1336. Kohlberg's claim that moral development proceeds through an invariant sequence of stages was examined experimentally by attempting to induce regression and stage skipping. Fifththrough seventh-grade children were tested to determine their cognitive, perspective-taking, and moral development. Those children with the stages of cognitive and perspective-taking development held by Kohlberg to be prerequisite to further moral development were exposed, in a brief role-playing situation, to 1 of the treatment conditions: 1-stage-below reasoning, 1-stage-above reasoning, 2-stages-above reasoning, neutral treatment, or no treatment. Moral-reasoning posttests followed 1 and 7 weeks later. Results supported the sequentiality claim as development was always to the next higher stage. However, contrary to the view that exposure to 1-stage-above reasoning represents the optimal means to induce development, it was found that 2-stages-above reasoning was just as effective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lawrence J. Walker (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: