Why the study?
Following mixed findings from earlier sham-controlled trials, second-generation renal denervation devices have emerged, warranting a summary of current evidence, unresolved issues, future trials, and expanded clinical roles.
Does catheter-based renal denervation reduce blood pressure in patients with hypertension?
Does catheter-based renal denervation reduce blood pressure in patients with hypertension?
Second-generation renal denervation devices provide a safe and effective complementary or alternative treatment option for lowering blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled or resistant hypertension.
Supports RDN feasibility in resistant hypertension; leaves open efficacy pending sham-controlled trials.
Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) therapy, a new procedure that uses radiofrequency ablation to interrupt efferent and afferent renal sympathetic nerve fibers, is a complementary or alternative treatment to antihypertensive medications for optimal control of blood pressure (BP). Although several single-arm early proof-of-concept studies showed significant BP reduction, the largest sham-controlled study using the first-generation RDN device (SYMPLICITY HTN-3) failed to significantly reduce BP in patients with resistant hypertension who were taking the guideline-based combination of antihypertensive medications. Since then, new devices and techniques have been developed to improve the efficacy and safety of RDN procedures. Sham-controlled trials using second-generation RDN devices (radiofrequency- and ultrasound-based) have provided solid evidence for their BP-lowering efficacy with and without the use of concomitant antihypertensive medication. Moreover, the safety profile of RDN in several registries and clinical trials appears to be excellent. This review summarizes the current evidence for RDN and discusses its current issues, future trials, Asian perspectives, and potential roles in both hypertension and other morbidities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: