Why the study?
This study focused on clarifying the durability of bioprosthetic valves in current practice, particularly in patients on dialysis.
Does dialysis accelerate structural valve deterioration in patients receiving bioprosthetic aortic valves?
Does dialysis accelerate structural valve deterioration in patients receiving bioprosthetic aortic valves?
Bioprosthetic aortic valves have significantly reduced durability in dialysis patients, with only ~50% freedom from structural valve deterioration at 6 years, suggesting mechanical valves may be preferable for younger dialysis patients.
Low SVD rates observed after bioprosthetic AVR; hypothesis-generating and leaves open durability questions in dialysis patients.
PURPOSE: This study focused on clarifying the durability of bioprosthetic valves in current practice. METHODS: A total of 238 consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve replacement at a single institution from 2011 to 2020 were reviewed. We evaluated valve-related outcomes such as structural valve deterioration (SVD), especially in dialysis patients who received bioprosthetic valve. RESULTS: Among the tissue valves implanted in 212 patients, 5 SVDs were recorded and 3 valves were replaced. All early valve failures occurred in relatively young dialysis patients and were recorded 3 to 5 years after the initial operation. Freedom from SVD at 6 years was 49.9% in patients on dialysis, compared with 100% in non-dialysis patients. Predictors of better survival in dialysis patients were better preoperative functional class and larger prosthetic valve size. CONCLUSIONS: The durability of bioprosthetic valves in the aortic position was suboptimal in dialysis patients. Mechanical valves can be an option for young, healthy dialysis patients with a large aortic valve annulus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uzuka et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: