Isoprene (2‐methyl 1, 3‐butadiene) is emitted from many plants, especially trees. We tested the effect of growth at high CO 2 partial pressure and sun versus shade conditions on the capacity of Quercus rubra L. (red oak) and Populus tremuloides Michx. (quaking aspen) leaves to make isoprene. Oak leaves grown at high CO 2 partial pressure (65 Pa) had twice the rate of isoprene emission as leaves grown at 40Pa CO 2 . However, aspen leaves behaved oppositely, with high CO 2 ‐grown leaves having just 60‐70% the rate of isoprene emission as leaves grown in 40 Pa CO 2 . Similar responses were observed from 25 to 35 °C leaf temperature during assay. The stimulation of isoprene emission by growth at high CO 2 and the stimulation in high temperature resulted in isoprene emission consuming over 15% of the carbon fixed during photosynthesis in high‐CO 2 grown oak leaves assayed at 35 °C. Leaves from the south (sunny) sides of trees growing in natural conditions had rates of isoprene emission double those of leaves growing in shaded locations on the same trees. This effect was similar in both aspen and oak. The leaves used for these experiments had significantly different chlorophyll a/b ratios indicating they were functionally sun (from the sunny locations) or shade leaves (from the protected locations). Because the metabolic pathway of isoprene synthesis is unknown, we are unable to speculate about how or why these effects occur. However, these effects are more consistent with metabolic control of isoprene release rather than a metabolic leak of isoprene from metabolism. The results are also important for large scale modelling of isoprene emission and for predicting the effect of future increases in atmospheric CO 2 level on isoprene emission from vegetation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharkey et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: