Why the study?
Branch pulmonary artery stenosis commonly occurs in congenital heart disease, but the impact of pulmonary artery stent interventions on ventricular function is unknown.
Does intravascular stenting improve ventricular flow efficiency in a swine model of unilateral branch pulmonary artery stenosis?
Does intravascular stenting improve ventricular flow efficiency in a swine model of unilateral branch pulmonary artery stenosis?
In a swine model of pulmonary artery stenosis, stent interventions normalized bi-ventricular flow efficiency as measured by 4D flow CMR, demonstrating the utility of these imaging biomarkers for detecting early ventricular dysfunction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PA stenting improved bi-ventricular efficiency in PAS models; leaves open need for prospective human confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Branch pulmonary artery (PA) stenosis (PAS) commonly occurs in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). Prior studies have documented technical success and clinical outcomes of PA stent interventions for PAS but the impact of PA stent interventions on ventricular function is unknown. The objective of this study was to utilize 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to better understand the impact of PAS and PA stenting on ventricular contraction and ventricular flow in a swine model of unilateral branch PA stenosis. METHODS: 18 swine (4 sham, 4 untreated left PAS, 10 PAS stent intervention) underwent right heart catheterization and CMR at 20 weeks age (55 kg). CMR included ventricular strain analysis and 4D flow CMR. RESULTS: 4D flow CMR measured inefficient right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) flow patterns in the PAS group (RV non-dimensional (n.d.) vorticity: sham 82 ± 47, PAS 120 ± 47; LV n.d. vorticity: sham 57 ± 5, PAS 78 ± 15 p < 0.01) despite the PAS group having normal heart rate, ejection fraction and end-diastolic volume. The intervention group demonstrated increased ejection fraction that resulted in more efficient ventricular flow compared to untreated PAS (RV n.d. vorticity: 59 ± 12 p < 0.01; LV n.d. vorticity: 41 ± 7 p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These results describe previously unknown consequences of PAS on ventricular function in an animal model of unilateral PA stenosis and show that PA stent interventions improve ventricular flow efficiency. This study also highlights the sensitivity of 4D flow CMR biomarkers to detect earlier ventricular dysfunction assisting in identification of patients who may benefit from PAS interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pewowaruk et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: