Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The ability to compute a quality index for manipulation tasks, in different configurations, has been widely used in robotics. However, it is poorly explored in human manipulation and physical human-robot collaboration (pHRC). Existing works that evaluate efficiency of human manipulation often focus only on heurisitic-based, biomechanics or ergonomics methods/tasks. Complementarity between these performance features allows for a better evaluation and more general criteria, applicable across tasks. This letter addressess this gap by generating a new metric that combines offline pre-computation of biomechanics, ergonomics, muscle assessment and joint constraints, and reducing the online time complexity, enhancing the response query time. The proposed solution allow us to build a quality distribution in the human's workspace which can be quickly tailored to specific tasks and filtered for design purposes. This method simplifies human manipulability assessment for both general and task-specific applications and, in contrast to existing works, is suitable for real-time and/or resource-limited applications. Numerical evidence shows the proposed analysis greatly outperforms previous results in terms of computing time without compromising performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Figueredo et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: