Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A well-known person fit statistic in the item response theory (IRT) literature is the [12pt]{minimal} {amsmath} {wasysym} {amsfonts} {amssymb} {amsbsy} {mathrsfs} {upgreek} {}{-69pt} {document}lz{document} statistic (Drasgow et al. in Br J Math Stat Psychol 38(1):67-86, 1985). Snijders (Psychometrika 66(3):331-342, 2001) derived [12pt]{minimal} {amsmath} {wasysym} {amsfonts} {amssymb} {amsbsy} {mathrsfs} {upgreek} {}{-69pt} {document}lz*{document}, which is the asymptotically correct version of [12pt]{minimal} {amsmath} {wasysym} {amsfonts} {amssymb} {amsbsy} {mathrsfs} {upgreek} {}{-69pt} {document}lz{document} when the ability parameter is estimated. However, both statistics and other extensions later developed concern either only the unidimensional IRT models or multidimensional models that require a joint estimate of latent traits across all the dimensions. Considering a marginalized maximum likelihood ability estimator, this paper proposes [12pt]{minimal} {amsmath} {wasysym} {amsfonts} {amssymb} {amsbsy} {mathrsfs} {upgreek} {}{-69pt} {document}lzt{document} and [12pt]{minimal} {amsmath} {wasysym} {amsfonts} {amssymb} {amsbsy} {mathrsfs} {upgreek} {}{-69pt} {document}lzt*{document}, which are extensions of [12pt]{minimal} {amsmath} {wasysym} {amsfonts} {amssymb} {amsbsy} {mathrsfs} {upgreek} {}{-69pt} {document}lz{document} and [12pt]{minimal} {amsmath} {wasysym} {amsfonts} {amssymb} {amsbsy} {mathrsfs} {upgreek} {}{-69pt} {document}lz*{document}, respectively, for the Rasch testlet model. The computation of [12pt]{minimal} {amsmath} {wasysym} {amsfonts} {amssymb} {amsbsy} {mathrsfs} {upgreek} {}{-69pt} {document}lzt*{document} relies on several extensions of the Lord-Wingersky algorithm (1984) that are additional contributions of this paper. Simulation results show that [12pt]{minimal} {amsmath} {wasysym} {amsfonts} {amssymb} {amsbsy} {mathrsfs} {upgreek} {}{-69pt} {document}lzt*{document} has close-to-nominal Type I error rates and satisfactory power for detecting aberrant responses. For unidimensional models, [12pt]{minimal} {amsmath} {wasysym} {amsfonts} {amssymb} {amsbsy} {mathrsfs} {upgreek} {}{-69pt} {document}lzt{document} and [12pt]{minimal} {amsmath} {wasysym} {amsfonts} {amssymb} {amsbsy} {mathrsfs} {upgreek} {}{-69pt} {document}lzt*{document} reduce to [12pt]{minimal} {amsmath} {wasysym} {amsfonts} {amssymb} {amsbsy} {mathrsfs} {upgreek} {}{-69pt} {document}lz{document} and [12pt]{minimal} {amsmath} {wasysym} {amsfonts} {amssymb} {amsbsy} {mathrsfs} {upgreek} {}{-69pt} {document}lz*{document}, respectively, and therefore allows for the evaluation of person fit with a wider range of IRT models. A real data application is presented to show the utility of the proposed statistics for a test with an underlying structure that consists of both the traditional unidimensional component and the Rasch testlet component.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: