Why the study?
Does low-dose prasugrel compared to standard-dose clopidogrel affect the risk of adverse events in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI?
Does low-dose prasugrel compared to standard-dose clopidogrel affect the risk of adverse events in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI?
May warrant lower prasugrel dosing consideration in Japanese patients; leaves open confirmation versus standard regimens in randomized trials.
Background: Lower loading and maintenance doses of prasugrel have been established for Japanese patients (loading dose [LD]/maintenance dose [MD], 20/3.75mg) compared to those for Western patients (LD/MD, 60/10mg), considering the higher average age, lower body weight, and increased bleeding risk with other thrombotic agents in Japanese patients. Although it has been reported that even low-dose prasugrel achieves stronger antiplatelet effect and fewer cardiovascular events compared to standard-dose clopidogrel in Japanese patients, there are limited data comparing the safety between low-dose prasugrel and standard-dose clopidogrel. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of adverse events induced by prasugrel compared to clopidogrel in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in common clinical settings. Methods: Data from 1,031 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease undergoing PCI in our hospitals from May 2014 to April 2016, who received aspirin plus either clopidogrel (619 patients) or prasugrel (412 patients), were analyzed, retrospectively. The choice of clopidogrel or prasugrel was left to the operator's discretion. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal ischemic stroke. Adverse events were defined as a composite of bleeding, hepatopathy, leukopenia, thorombopenia, exanthema, and MACE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tokimasa et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: