Key result
Bihemispheric tDCS improves post-stroke motor performance compared with sham stimulation.
RCT
Sham-controlled
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recovery of function after a stroke is determined by a balance of activity in the neural network involving both the affected and the unaffected brain hemispheres. Increased activity in the affected hemisphere can promote recovery, while excessive activity in the unaffected hemisphere may represent a maladaptive strategy. We therefore investigated whether reduction of the excitability in the unaffected hemisphere by cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation could result in motor performance improvement in stroke patients. We compared these results with excitability-enhancing anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the affected hemisphere and sham transcranial direct current stimulation. Both cathodal stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere and anodal stimulation of the affected hemisphere (but not sham transcranial direct current stimulation) improved motor performance significantly. These results suggest that the appropriate modulation of bihemispheric brain structures can promote motor function recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fregni et al. (2005) conducted an RCT in Stroke. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere vs. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the affected hemisphere and sham transcranial direct current stimulation was evaluated on Motor performance improvement. Cathodal tDCS of the unaffected hemisphere and anodal tDCS of the affected hemisphere both significantly improved motor performance in stroke patients compared with sham tDCS.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: