Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The authors (who are academics in Waste Management) acknowledge that it is advantageous to have a research proposal subjected to rigorous checking (by the ethical approval process), and that the support of the REC strengthens the credibility and validity of evidence-based research. However, in criticising the 'protracted' process they refer to the old application form and to COREC patient information sheets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Woolridge et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: