Why the study?
Does a second 'time-out' surgical checklist reduce peri-operative complications in patients undergoing lengthy robotic surgeries?
Does a second 'time-out' surgical checklist reduce peri-operative complications in patients undergoing lengthy robotic surgeries?
Implementing a second 'time-out' checklist 3-4 hours into lengthy robotic surgeries may help prevent positioning injuries, monitor physiological changes, and reduce staff fatigue.
Hypothesis-generating for second time-out checklist in extended robotic surgery; prospective trials needed before adoption.
Robotic surgeries of long duration are associated with both increased risks to patients as well as distinct challenges for care providers. We propose a surgical checklist, to be completed during a second "time-out", aimed at reducing peri-operative complications and addressing obstacles presented by lengthy robotic surgeries. A review of the literature was performed to identify the most common complications of robotic surgeries with extended operative times. A surgical checklist was developed with the goal of addressing these issues and maximizing patient safety. Extended operative times during robotic surgery increase patient risk for position-related complications and other adverse events. These cases also raise concerns for surgical, anesthesia, and nursing staff which are less common in shorter, non-robotic operations. Key elements of the checklist were designed to coordinate operative staff in verifying patient safety while addressing the unique concerns within each specialty. As robotic surgery is increasingly utilized, operations with long surgical times may become more common due to increased case complexity and surgeons overcoming the learning curve. A standardized surgical checklist, conducted three to four hours after the start of surgery, may enhance perioperative patient safety and quality of care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: