Why the study?
Does Boiogito (TJ-20) improve renal function and heart failure status in patients with cardiorenal syndrome?
Does Boiogito (TJ-20) improve renal function and heart failure status in patients with cardiorenal syndrome?
The addition of the traditional Japanese medicine Boiogito (TJ-20) to conventional therapy may independently improve both renal function and heart failure status in patients with cardiorenal syndrome.
May support TJ-20 adjunct in cardiorenal syndrome; hypothesis-generating and requires RCTs before practice change.
Background:Conventional treatment for cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is frequently associated with drug resistance and limited clinical success.We aimed to explore a new approach utilizing Boiogito (TJ-20), a traditional Japanese medicine(Kampo),in combination with conventional treatment for patients with CRS. Methods and Results:We enrolled 26 patients with CRS (18 men;mean age,77±8.4 years;mean serum brain natriuretic peptide(BNP),241.5±196.6 pg/mL;mean estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR),40.02±10.54 mL.min .1.73 m ). Treatment with TJ-20 was started at an average dose of 4.6±1.5 g/day, which was increased to 5.2±1.2 g/day at 3.5 months and to 5.9±1.5 g/day at 9.4 months.TJ-20 treatment significantly increased mean eGFR (mL.min .1.73 m )to 44.60±10.76 at 3.5 months (P=0.001),and to 45.93±11.57 at 9. 4 months (P=0.0004).In addition,the New York Heart Association functional classification improved (P=0. 019),and serum BNP levels decreased significantly to 195.5±145.7 pg/mL at 3.5 months(P=0.008)and to 163. 3±130.2 pg/mL at 9.4 months (P=0.007).The increase in eGFR had no correlation with the decrease in BNP level,indicating independent effects on both renal function and heart failure status. Conclusions:TJ-20 can benefit both renal function and heart failure status in patients with CRS.Alternative medicine utilizing TJ-20 may provide a novel and useful strategy for the difficult management of patients with CRS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gautam et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: