Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The objective of this letter is to demonstrate the complementary nature of speaker-specific information present in the residual phase in comparison with the information present in the conventional mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs). The residual phase is derived from speech signal by linear prediction analysis. Speaker recognition studies are conducted on the NIST-2003 database using the proposed residual phase and the existing MFCC features. The speaker recognition system based on the residual phase gives an equal error rate (EER) of 22%, and the system using the MFCC features gives an EER of 14%. By combining the evidence from both the residual phase and the MFCC features, an EER of 10.5% is obtained, indicating that speaker-specific excitation information is present in the residual phase. This information is useful since it is complementary to that of MFCCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murty et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: