In a review of my book “Wahrscheinlichkeitslehre”, Dr. Ernest Nagel has recently criticized some of my ideas on probability and induction. His review includes a good exposition of my ideas, and I have to thank him for his serious attempts to do justice to my results. He attacks, however, some very essential points of my theory. I may be allowed, therefore, to answer him as frankly and thoroughly as he attacks me.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hans Reichenbach (1938) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: