Why the study?
NAG and KIM-1 are potential biomarkers for cardiorenal syndrome, but their prognostic capability regarding chronic kidney disease progression in patients with an ICD required evaluation.
Do NAG and KIM-1 levels predict the progression of chronic kidney disease in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator?
Do NAG and KIM-1 levels predict the progression of chronic kidney disease in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator?
NAG, but not KIM-1, serves as an independent predictor for progressive deterioration of kidney function in patients with an ICD.
Aim: NAG and KIM-1 as markers of tubular damage are suggested as potential biomarkers for the cardiorenal syndrome. The aim of the study was to assess the prognostic capability of NAG and KIM-1 regarding progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Materials & methods: We included 313 patients with an ICD and collected plasma and urine samples. Follow-up was performed after 51 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 25–55). The outcome of interest was continuous CKD progression defined as persistent decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate category accompanied by a ≥25% drop of baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate. Results: An average of four (IQR: 2–6) follow-up values of serum creatinine per patient were obtained. During follow-up 29 patients (9%) developed a continuous CKD progression. NAG was shown as independent predictor for continuous CKD progression (p = 0.01), opposite to KIM-1 (p = n.s.). Conclusion: NAG was shown as predictor for a progressive and real deterioration of kidney function in patients with ICD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allgaier et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: