Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The hairpin form of the mismatched octamer d(m5C-G-m5C-G-T-G-m5C-G) was studied by means of NMR spectroscopy. In a companion study it is shown that the hairpin form of this DNA fragment consists of a structure with a stem of three Watson-Crick-type base pairs and a loop consisting of only two nucleotides. The non-exchangeable proton resonances were assigned by means of two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy and two-dimensional nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy. Proton-proton coupling constants were used for the conformational analysis of the deoxyribose ring and for some of the backbone torsion angles. From the two-dimensional NMR spectra and the coupling-constant analysis it is concluded that: (i) the stem of the hairpin exhibits B-DNA characteristics; (ii) the sugar rings are not conformationally pure, but display a certain amount of conformational flexibility; (iii) the stacking interaction in the stem of the hairpin is elongated from the 3'-side in a more or less regular fashion with the two loop nucleotides; (iv) at the 5'-side of the stem a stacking discontinuity occurs between the stem and the loop; (v) at the 5'-side of the stem the loop is closed by means of a sharp backbone turn which involves unusual gamma' and beta+ torsion angles in residue dG(6). The NMR results led to the construction of a hairpin-loop model which was energy-minimized by means of a molecular-mechanics program. The results clearly show that a DNA hairpin-loop structure in which the loop consists of only two nucleotides bridging the minor groove in a straightforward fashion, (i) causes no undue steric strain, and (ii) involves well-known conformational principles throughout the course of the backbone. The hairpin form of the title compound is compared with the hairpin form of d(A-T-C-C-T-A-T4-T-A-G-G-A-T), in which the central -T4- part forms a loop of four nucleotides. Both models display similarities as far as stacking interactions are concerned.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orbons et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: