Why the study?
Does the 2CRM algorithm accurately identify arrhythmias from intraatrial and intraventricular electrograms?
Does the 2CRM algorithm accurately identify arrhythmias from intraatrial and intraventricular electrograms?
The 2CRM algorithm demonstrates high accuracy in real-time arrhythmia identification using dual-chamber intracardiac electrograms, which may help reduce inappropriate ICD shocks.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid ICD arrhythmia detection to reduce shocks; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators have dramatically improved survival rates for patients at risk of sudden cardiac death, but the occurrence of inappropriate shocks remains an unresolved problem. Various means for better tachycardia detection, chiefly morphological analysis, have been proposed to address this problem. A new computerized scheme entitled Two-Channel Rate-Morphology (2CRM) was introduced. It is a real-time arrhythmia detection algorithm that combines timing and morphology information from intraatrial and intraventricular electrograms for arrhythmia diagnosis. The program 2CRM applies an initial cycle-by-cycle coding scheme followed by contextual diagnosis of underlying rhythm. The program was tested on 36 distinct passages of two-channel intracardiac signals from 30 patients. The distribution of the arrhythmias are as follows: 4 atrial fibrillation, 6 atrial flutter, 6 supraventricular tachycardia, 10 ventricular tachycardia, and 10 ventricular flutter-fibrillation. Of the analyzed 3,417 individual cardiac cycles 3,135 (91.7%) were correctly identified. Contextual diagnosis reversed 123 single-cycle errors to obtain a performance of 3,258 correct out of 3,417 (95.3%). Utilizing an uninterrupted continuous correct contextual diagnosis as indicator of successful arrhythmia detection, 2CRM obtained an accuracy of 34 out of 36 passages (94.4%).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiang et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: