Why the study?
Does the filtered bipolar esophageal lead accurately diagnose the mechanism of arrhythmias compared to invasive coronary sinus electrograms in patients with tachycardia or bradycardia?
Does the filtered bipolar esophageal lead accurately diagnose the mechanism of arrhythmias compared to invasive coronary sinus electrograms in patients with tachycardia or bradycardia?
The filtered bipolar esophageal lead provides a reliable, non-invasive alternative to coronary sinus leads for diagnosing the mechanism of various arrhythmias, including differentiating accessory pathways and AV node reentry.
May support non-invasive arrhythmia mechanism diagnosis; leaves open prospective validation versus coronary sinus recordings.
Electrophysiologic study was performed in 25 patients with tachycardia or bradycardia attacks. The coronary sinus (CS) and filtered bipolar esophageal electrograms were recorded simultaneously to compare the phase of atrial activations. During sinus rhythm and high right atrial pacing, the esophageal and proximal CS atrial activations were nearly simultaneous but earlier by 26 +/- 5 msec on the average than the distal CS atrial activations. During reciprocating tachycardia due to reentry using a left-side accessory atrioventricular pathway for retrograde conduction the esophageal and CS atrial activations occurred earlier than the low septal right atrial activation, so the esophageal lead can be used as a substitute for the CS lead to clarify the eccentric retrograde atrial activation sequence. By using the filtered bipolar esophageal lead, the interval from Q wave on the surface electrocardiogram to the first rapid deflection in the esophageal atrial activation (Q-AESO interval) was measured in 15 patients with supra-ventricular tachycardia. All patients with reciprocating tachycardia due to reentry using a left side accessory atrioventricular pathway had Q-AESO intervals between 100 to 130 msec and four of five patients with a right side accessory atrioventricular pathway for retrograde conduction had Q-AESO intervals between 130 to 150 msec. In contrast, all patients with reentry in the atrioventricular node had Q-AESO intervals between 30 to 60 msec. The esophageal lead is also of value in the prompt diagnosis of atrial flutter and ventricular tachycardia, since the esophageal electrograms readily reveal the relationship between atrial and ventricular activations. In conclusion, the filtered bipolar esophageal lead provides a non-invasive method for the quick diagnosis of various arrhythmias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ishinaga et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: