Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a clinical and laboratory symptom complex characterized by recurrent thrombosis, obstetric pathology and the synthesis of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). The 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria differ from the previous ones (Sapporo, 2006) by a weighted assessment in points and the allocation of a mandatory “entry” criterion, which contains at least one clinical sign plus a positive result of the aPL test, including detection of lupus anticoagulant (LAC) or moderate (40-79 U) or high (≥80 U) levels of IgG/IgM antibodies to cardiolipin (aCL) or IgG/IgM antibodies to β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2-GP I) in blood within 3 years after identifying the clinical criterion. The greatest significance for diagnosing APS and predicting a high risk of thrombotic complications is the persistent detection of LAC and highly positive levels of IgG aCL and/or IgG aβ2-GP I, the least important is a single identification of LAC and persistent detection of moderate/high positive levels of IgM aCL and/or IgM aβ2 -GP I. The ACR/EULAR 2023 classification criteria for APS have greater diagnostic specificity (99% vs 86%), but lower diagnostic sensitivity (84% vs 99%) compared to the previous ones (Sapporo, 2006).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Александрова et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: