Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The molecular structures of dimethylamino[(dimethylboryl)methylamino]methylborane, Me2NBMeNMeBMe2 (1) and 1,1-bis(dimethylboryl)-2,2-dimethylhydrazine, (Me2B)2NNMe2 (2) have been determined by gas electron diffraction (GED), density functional theory calculations at the B3PW91/6-311++G** level and ab initio calculations at the MP2/6-311++G** level. 1 adopts an open structure similar to that of the isoelectronic hydrocarbon molecule permethylbutadiene; the central B-N bond distance at 148.0/149.3(7) pm (MP2/GED) corresponds to a single covalent N--B bond distance, the two terminal distances, 140.9/140.5(4) pm and 141.8/141.3(4) pm, correspond to the distance between N and B atoms joined by a covalent sigma-bond and a dative pi-bond. A closed form where the establishment of a dative bond between the terminal N and B atoms has led to the formation of a four-membered ring also corresponds to a minimum on the potential energy surface, but the energy is calculated to be 14.3 kJ mol(-1) higher at the MP2 level. This structure is also incompatible with the GED data. 2 adopts a structure in which a dative sigma-bond between the dimethylamino N atom and one of the boron atoms has led to the formation of a three-membered N(2)B ring. The dative sigma-bond distance is 165.5/164.0(13) pm, the two other bond distances in the ring are N-B=150.6/148.9(9) pm corresponding to a covalent sigma-bond and N-N=145.1/145.4(3) pm. The terminal B--N distance 139.6/138.9(9) pm is consistent with a covalent sigma-bond augmented by a dative pi-bond. An open Y-shaped structure also corresponds to a minimum on the potential energy surface, but the energy is 18.7 kJ mol(-1) higher (MP2) and it is incompatible with the GED data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Østby et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: