Evaluates fellowship outcomes in robotic surgery, indicating areas for improvement.
Objective The aim of this paper is to evaluate fellowship outcomes 10 years after implementation of the European Association of Urology Robotic Section (ERUS) structured curriculum for robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), with a focus on completion rates and reasons for non‐completion. Subjects and methods Data were obtained from institutional records and a trainee survey. The primary outcome was fellowship completion (i.e., Certificate of Excellence achievement). Secondary outcomes included reasons for non‐completion and satisfaction. Completion rates were analysed annually, with trends assessed using the Cochran–Armitage test and log‐linear regression for the Estimated Annual Percentage Change (EAPC). Comparisons before and after introduction of a procedural diary (2023) and between pandemic and non‐pandemic years used Fisher's Exact Test. Results Among 126 fellows, a total of 42 (33%) completed the fellowship by achieving the Certificate of Excellence. The trainee survey achieved a response rate of 77%, supporting the representativeness of the collected data. The main barriers to fellowship completion included limited console access (49%), insufficient programme duration (20%), logistical difficulties (20%) and COVID‐19‐related disruptions (11%). Despite these limitations, overall satisfaction with the fellowship was high (83%), with particularly strong approval of the ORSI hands‐on training week (100%). Completion rates demonstrated a progressive increase over time, rising from 20% in 2018 to 52% in 2023. The Cochran–Armitage test confirmed a statistically significant upward trend in completion rates over the study period ( p < 0.001), while log‐linear regression analysis showed a numerical but non‐significant EAPC of 13% (95% CI –0.6 to 28.6). Although 2023 represented the highest observed completion rate, this peak was not significantly different from previous years (OR 2.63, 95% CI 0.91–7.63). Conclusions The RARP ERUS Fellowship remains a benchmark in robotic training, but unsatisfactory completion rates highlight the need for improvement. Recent reforms, including the procedural diary, show promise and warrant expansion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paciotti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: