Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, passivity-based methods are used to perform tracking control of flexible robot manipulators subject to impact collision. The model taken for colliding system is an n-degree of freedom body moving in the manipulator’s workspace. Impulsive forces generated in the course of impact cause sudden changes in velocity/acceleration of the links of robot and the colliding system. On the other hand, under-actuated systems subject to impact are likely to have instabilities, or poor transient responses, due to excitation of some un-actuated states. The proposed adaptive passivity-based controller not only improves the post-impact transient response of the under-actuated system (e.g. flexible-joint robot), but also needs no force sensor to measure impulse force during the impact phase of robot motion. The main advantage of the proposed controller relative to model-based inverse-dynamic algorithms is its highly robust characteristics in dampening effects of oscillation right after impact collision for an under-actuated system. This can be done through the introduction of an energy-storage function which incorporates the effects of both actuated and un-actuated states of the system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahmoodi et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: