Why the study?
Antisense approaches reduce DUX4 expression locally, but enhanced chemistries systemically administered to treat Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy had not been evaluated.
Does systemic antisense inhibition of DUX4 improve muscle function in an FSHD mouse model?
Does systemic antisense inhibition of DUX4 improve muscle function in an FSHD mouse model?
Systemic administration of an optimized antisense therapeutic targeting DUX4 successfully reduces target gene expression and improves muscle function and pathology in an FSHD mouse model.
Antisense targeting of pLAM1 reduces DUX4 in vitro; leaves open clinical translation from Level 5 evidence.
Aberrant expression of the double homeobox 4 ( DUX4 ) gene in skeletal muscle causes muscle deterioration and weakness in Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy (FSHD). Since the presence of a permissive pLAM1 polyadenylation signal is essential for stabilization of DUX4 mRNA and translation of DUX4 protein, disrupting the function of this structure can prevent expression of DUX4. We and others have shown promising results using antisense approaches to reduce DUX4 expression in vitro and in vivo following local intramuscular administration. Our group has developed further the antisense chemistries, and demonstrate here enhanced in vitro antisense efficacy. The optimal chemistry was conjugated to a cell-penetrating moiety, and for the first time in FSHD research has been systemically administered into a double-transgenic mouse model of FSHD. After four weekly treatments, mRNA quantities of DUX4 and target genes were reduced by 50% that led to a 5% increase in muscle mass, a 52% improvement in in situ muscle strength, and reduction of muscle fibrosis by 17%. Systemic DUX4 inhibition also improved the locomotor activity significantly and reduced the fatigue level by 22%. Our data overall demonstrate that the optimized antisense approach can contribute to future development of a therapeutic strategy for FSHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu‐Nguyen et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: