Why the study?
Does anti-cytokine therapy improve outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure?
Does anti-cytokine therapy improve outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure?
Early clinical trials of anti-cytokine therapies like infliximab and etanercept in chronic heart failure have yielded discouraging results, highlighting the need for a better understanding of the inflammatory network in CHF.
Early discouraging results caution against anti-cytokine therapy in chronic heart failure; leaves open refined inflammatory modulation after deeper pathway insight.
Until some decades ago chronic heart failure (CHF) has been considered a haemodynamic disorder with neurohormonal activation. Thus, the therapeutic strategies were oriented to correct cardiovascular disarrangement and counteract neurohormones. Although these therapeutic interventions improved CHF prognosis, mortality and morbidity CHF related remained high. In the recent years experimental and clinical researches increased our knowledge on CHF pathophysiology. Specifically, the involvement of inflammatory cytokines in the progression of CHF become more and more evident. Therefore, correction of cytokine network may represent a new therapeutic strategy approach in the management of CHF. However, results obtained from the first clinical trials with engineered anti-cytokine molecules, such as Infliximab and Etanercept, are discouraging. More knowledge on the complex interplay among inflammatory molecules in heart failure will allow its transfer to the design of more effective therapeutic candidates. The present review addresses current information on this controversial issue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bachetti et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: