Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the usefulness of immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclasses against Candida cell wall fragments (CW) and phosphopeptidomannan (PPM) for the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis (IC). We analyzed 54 patients with IC (n = 19), Candida heavy colonization (HC; n = 16), and controls (no IC or HC, n = 19).In nonneutropenic patients (n = 47), the sensitivity and specificity values of IgG1 anti-CW and IgG2 anti-PPM in IC were 88%, 59%, and 88%, 94%, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.69 (0.51-0.88) and 0.901 (0.78-1.02), respectively. IgG1 mean values (arbitrary units) and 95% confidence interval were 46 (20-71), 42 (-0.38 to 84) and 20 (8.3-32) in IC, HC, and in controls, respectively, and discriminated IC but not HC from controls (P = .032, and P = .77, respectively). IgG2 mean values were 26 (9.2-42), 19 (4.4-33), and 3.2 (0.28-6.6) in IC, HC, and in controls, respectively, and discriminated both IC and HC from controls (P < .0001 and P = .035, respectively) but did not separate IC from HC (P = .2). IgG2 showed positivity as early as one day after the IC diagnosis. Antibodies were detected in only two out of a total of seven neutropenic patients.For both IC and HC patients, the diagnostic performance of IgG2 anti-PPM was better than the one of IgG1 anti-CW. In nonneutropenic patients, IgG2 anti-PPM accurately identified not only IC patients but also HC patients at high risk for IC. This marker may help clinicians in the initiation of early preemptive therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mattsby‐Baltzer et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: