Why the study?
Individual differences in vulnerability to depression remain underexplored among athletes.
Does a high brooding/reflection profile increase the odds of clinically relevant depressive symptoms in competitive athletes?
Does a high brooding/reflection profile increase the odds of clinically relevant depressive symptoms in competitive athletes?
High brooding and reflective rumination profiles are strongly associated with clinically relevant depressive symptoms in competitive athletes.
High brooding/reflection profiles may flag elevated depression risk in athletes; leaves open causal links and prevention potential.
Individual differences in vulnerability to depression are still underexplored in athletes. We tested the influence of different brooding and reflective rumination profiles (i.e., repetitive thought processes in response to low/depressed mood) on the odds of experiencing clinically relevant depressive symptoms in competitive athletes ( N = 286). The Patient Health Questionnaire–9 and the Ruminative Responses Scale–short form were utilized to measure depression and rumination, respectively. Compared to athletes with a low brooding/reflection profile, athletes with a high brooding/reflection profile had significantly higher odds of experiencing clinical levels of depressive symptoms (OR = 13.40, 95% CI = 3.81–47.11). A high reflection/low brooding profile was not, however, related to increased odds of depressive symptoms. Future research could extend our findings by exploring determinants of ruminative tendencies, especially brooding, in athletes. Furthermore, psychological interventions targeting rumination could be examined as a potential prevention and treatment approach to tackling depressive symptoms in athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tahtinen et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: