Why the study?
Does acute colchicine infusion alter electrophysiological properties and increase ventricular vulnerability in an experimental whole-heart model?
Does acute colchicine infusion alter electrophysiological properties and increase ventricular vulnerability in an experimental whole-heart model?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Acute colchicine infusion in an experimental rabbit heart model decreases the effective refractory period and increases the risk of ventricular fibrillation, suggesting potential pro-arrhythmic toxicity that warrants further clinical investigation.
The traditional gout medication colchicine has been reported to effectively prevent atrial fibrillation recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation or cardiac surgery in a few clinical trials. Severe adverse events have not yet been reported. The aim of the present study was to assess possible direct electrophysiological effects in an experimental whole-heart model. Ten rabbit hearts were isolated and Langendorff-perfused. Thereafter, colchicine was administered in two concentrations (1 and 3 μM). Eight endo- and epicardial monophasic action potentials and a 12-lead ECG showed a stable QT interval and action potential duration during colchicine infusion. Furthermore, there was no significant increase in dispersion of repolarization. However, colchicine induced a dose-dependent significant decrease of effective refractory period (ERP; 1 μM: -19 ms, 3 μM: -22 ms; p < 0.05). In the present study, acute infusion of colchicine in isolated rabbit hearts resulted in a reduction of ERP in the presence of a stable myocardial repolarization. This led to a significantly elevated inducibility of ventricular fibrillation. In 4 of 10 hearts, incessant ventricular fibrillation occurred. These results suggest a pro-arrhythmic or toxic effect of colchicine and underline that further clinical studies on potential adverse effects should be conducted before the drug can be recommended for routine use after atrial fibrillation ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frommeyer et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: