Why the study?
Does an automatic method using deformable model fitting and learning-based correction perform comparably to manual annotation for carotid wall volume quantification from MRI in elderly patients?
Does an automatic method using deformable model fitting and learning-based correction perform comparably to manual annotation for carotid wall volume quantification from MRI in elderly patients?
An automated MRI-based method for carotid wall volume quantification performs comparably to manual annotation, potentially streamlining vascular imaging analysis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May streamline research carotid MRI analysis; leaves open clinical adoption pending larger prospective validation.
We present a method for carotid vessel wall volume quantification from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The method combines lumen and outer wall segmentation based on deformable model fitting with a learning-based segmentation correction step. After selecting two initialization points, the vessel wall volume in a region around the bifurcation is automatically determined. The method was trained on eight datasets (16 carotids) from a population-based study in the elderly for which one observer manually annotated both the lumen and outer wall. An evaluation was carried out on a separate set of 19 datasets (38 carotids) from the same study for which two observers made annotations. Wall volume and normalized wall index measurements resulting from the manual annotations were compared to the automatic measurements. Our experiments show that the automatic method performs comparably to the manual measurements. All image data and annotations used in this study together with the measurements are made available through the website http://ergocar.bigr.nl.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hameeteman et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: