Why the study?
Research has inconsistently applied or omitted the formal definition of dysfunctional breathing, highlighting the need for consensus to ensure effective assessment and treatment.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Critical review
Inconsistent DB definitions warrant caution in assessment; leaves open consensus development for respiratory and musculoskeletal research.
Dysfunctional breathing (DB) refers to various abnormalities breathing patterns. Whilst a formal definition exists, subsequent research has inconsistently applied or omitted it. As interest in breathing techniques grows among both healthcare professionals and the public, it is important to reach a consensus on DB's definition to ensure effective assessment and treatment. This critical review explores how DB is currently defined and applied within respiratory and musculoskeletal health. A lack of consistency in the literature identified the need for a more comprehensive framework of DB. To address this, a new model of DB is proposed that includes three subcategories: biomechanical, biochemical and psychophysiological DB. This revised model offers a foundation for future research and clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pinder et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: