Why the study?
Given the widespread use of federally funded Diabetes Prevention Program-based lifestyle interventions, evaluating changes in American Heart Association cardiovascular health metrics within such programs is of national interest.
Does a yearlong DPP-based lifestyle intervention improve cardiovascular health metrics in overweight/obese individuals with prediabetes and/or metabolic syndrome?
Does a yearlong DPP-based lifestyle intervention improve cardiovascular health metrics in overweight/obese individuals with prediabetes and/or metabolic syndrome?
A community-based Diabetes Prevention Program lifestyle intervention significantly improves AHA cardiovascular health metrics over 12 months in high-risk individuals.
DPP-GLB improves Life's Simple 7 scores at 6/12 months; extends RCT evidence for AHA metrics in community DPP translations.
INTRODUCTION: The American Heart Association created "Life's Simple Seven" metrics to estimate progress toward improving US cardiovascular health in a standardized manner. Given the widespread use of federally funded Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP)-based lifestyle interventions such as the Group Lifestyle Balance (DPP-GLB), evaluation of change in health metrics within such a program is of national interest. This study examined change in cardiovascular health metric scores during the course of a yearlong DPP-GLB intervention. METHODS: Data were combined from 2 similar randomized trials offering a community based DPP-GLB lifestyle intervention to overweight/obese individuals with prediabetes and/or metabolic syndrome. Pre/post lifestyle intervention participation changes in 5 of the 7 cardiovascular health metrics were examined at 6 and 12 months (BMI, blood pressure, total cholesterol, fasting plasma glucose, physical activity). Smoking was rare and diet was not measured. RESULTS: Among 305 participants with complete data (81.8% of 373 eligible adults), significant improvements were demonstrated in all 5 risk factors measured continuously at 6 and 12 months. There were significant positive shifts in the "ideal" and "total" metric scores at both time points. Also noted were beneficial shifts in the proportion of participants across categories for BMI, activity, and blood pressure. CONCLUSION: AHA-metrics could have clinical utility in estimating an individual's cardiovascular health status and in capturing improvement in cardiometabolic/behavioral risk factors resulting from participation in a community-based translation of the DPP lifestyle intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Devaraj et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: