Population
Global health systems, specifically focusing on poor countries vs. rich countries
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Disproportionate costs on poor countries risk primary care sustainability; leaves open optimal global financing for eradication equity.
Highlights the ethical dilemma that poor countries bear the brunt of polio eradication costs while rich countries reap the financial benefits, necessitating long-term donor support for sustainable health development.
Taylor et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: