Why the study?
Pemafibrate, a selective PPARalpha modulator, was recently developed for hypertriglyceridemia, prompting evaluation of its efficacy and safety in clinical settings.
Does pemafibrate improve lipid profiles in patients with hypertriglyceridemia?
Does pemafibrate improve lipid profiles in patients with hypertriglyceridemia?
Pemafibrate effectively reduces triglycerides and improves liver injury indices without causing hepatic, renal, or muscle damage in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.
Pemafibrate was associated with improved lipoprotein metabolism in hypertriglyceridemia; leaves open cardiovascular benefit pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recently, pemafibrate, a selective PPARα modulator, has been developed as a treatment for hypertriglyceridemia and has attracted much attention. The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate in hypertriglyceridemia patients under clinical settings. METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated changes in lipid profiles and various parameters before and after 24-week pemafibrate administration in patients with hypertriglyceridemia who had not previously taken fibrate medications. There were 79 cases included in the analysis. 24 weeks after the treatment with pemafibrate, TG was significantly reduced from 312 ± 226 to 167 ± 94 mg/dL. In addition, lipoprotein fractionation tests using PAGE method showed a significant decrease in the ratio of VLDL and remnant fractionations, which are TG-rich lipoproteins. After pemafibrate administration, body weight, HbA1c, eGFR, and CK levels were not changed, but liver injury indices such as ALT, AST, and γ-GTP were significantly improved. CONCLUSION: In this study, pemafibrate improved the metabolism of atherosclerosis-induced lipoproteins in hypertriglyceridemia patients. In addition, it showed no off-target effects such as hepatic and renal damage or rhabdomyolysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katakura et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: