Why the study?
Despite promising findings for risk stratification, 123 I MIBG scintigraphy is not yet recommended by major HF guidelines or widely adopted in clinical practice.
123 I MIBG scintigraphy provides prognostic information regarding sympathetic innervation in heart failure and other conditions, though it has not yet been widely adopted or recommended by major guidelines for risk stratification.
MIBG scintigraphy refines risk stratification in systolic HF; confirms prognostic utility in late-phase trial.
Abstract 123 I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) is a radiolabeled norepinephrine analog that can be used to investigate myocardial sympathetic innervation. 123 I MIBG scintigraphy has been investigated with interest in many disease settings. In patients with systolic heart failure (HF), 123 I MIBG scintigraphy can capture functional impairment and rarefaction of sympathetic terminals (which manifest as reduced early and late heart-to-mediastinum [H/M] ratio on planar scintigraphy), and increased sympathetic outflow (which can be visualized as high washout rate). These findings have been consistently associated with a worse outcome: most notably, a phase 3 trial found that patients with a late H/M 1.60 have a higher incidence of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and life-threatening arrhythmias over a follow-up of less than 2 years. Despite these promising findings, 123 I MIBG scintigraphy has not yet been recommended by major HF guidelines as a tool for additive risk stratification, and has then never entered the stage of widespread adoption into current clinical practice. 123 I MIBG scintigraphy has been evaluated also in patients with myocardial infarction, genetic disorders characterized by an increased susceptibility to ventricular arrhythmias, and several other conditions characterized by impaired sympathetic myocardial innervation. In the present chapter we will summarize the state-of-the-art on cardiac 123 I MIBG scintigraphy, the current unresolved issues, and the possible directions of future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2021 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: