Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess if there is a relationship between residential radon and lung cancer histological types and patients' age at diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter hospital-based case-control study with eight participating hospitals. We included 216 never-smoking cases with primary lung cancer and 329 never-smoking controls. Controls were frequency matched with cases on age and sex distribution. Of them, 198 cases (91.7%) and 275 controls (83.5%) had residential radon measurements. RESULTS: Lung cancer risk reached statistical significance only for adenocarcinoma (Odds ratio [OR] 2.19; 95% Confidence interval [CI] 1.44-3.33), for other histologies the results were marginally significant. Residential radon level was higher for patients diagnosed before 50 and 60 years old than for older lung cancer cases. CONCLUSIONS: Residential radon in never smokers seems to be a risk factor for all lung cancer histologies. Individuals diagnosed at a younger age have a higher residential radon concentration, suggesting an accumulative effect on lung cancer appearance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Torres‐Durán et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: