Why the study?
Are sequential intravenous naloxone challenge tests reliable in heroin addicts stabilized on methadone?
Are sequential intravenous naloxone challenge tests reliable in heroin addicts stabilized on methadone?
Sequential naloxone challenge tests demonstrate moderate to high reliability across subjective and objective measures of withdrawal in methadone-stabilized patients.
May support reliability of sequential naloxone challenges for withdrawal assessment in methadone patients; leaves open validation in larger prospective studies.
To determine the reliability of serial naloxone challenges, five heroin addicts stabilized on methadone were given 0.2 mg naloxone intravenously on three consecutive days. Two-factor ANOVA revealed that the between-subjects effect accounted for at least 63% of the variance in each of the dependent measures, and the effect of challenge number for at most 22%. Withdrawal tended to be slightly more severe for the first challenge. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for the area-under-the-curve of the change from baseline: subject-rated (.74) and observer-rated (.71) withdrawal, pulse (.88), systolic blood pressure (.58), diastolic blood pressure (.85), and skin temperature (.63).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosen et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: