Why the study?
Does prophylactic temporary pacemaker placement improve survival in patients with left bundle-branch block following acute myocardial infarction?
Does prophylactic temporary pacemaker placement improve survival in patients with left bundle-branch block following acute myocardial infarction?
Left bundle-branch block in acute myocardial infarction does not adversely affect prognosis and is not an indication for prophylactic pacemaker insertion.
May not support routine prophylactic pacing in LBBB post-MI; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
Of 27 patients with left bundle-branch block following acute myocardial infarction, five died. Left bundle-branch block was present on admission in 26 patients, and subsequently appeared in one. Fourteen of 16 patients who did not have a temporary pacemaker placed prophylactically survived the acute myocardial infarction. Of the 22 survivors, 16 are still alive, an average of 12.7 months after the acute myocardial infarction. Thus, left bundle-branch block in acute myocardial infarction does not affect prognosis, and is not an indication for prophylactic insertion of a transvenous pacemaker or of a permanent pacemaker.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lawrence Gould (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: