Why the study?
What is the value of various echocardiographic modalities in predicting future cardiac events after acute myocardial infarction?
What is the value of various echocardiographic modalities in predicting future cardiac events after acute myocardial infarction?
Echocardiography, through its various modalities, provides essential, low-cost, and safe prognostic stratification for patients following an acute myocardial infarction.
Reinforces echocardiography for post-MI prognostication; leaves open whether echo-guided strategies improve outcomes in prospective trials.
Short- and long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction mainly depends on three factors: the amount of myocardium that had become necrotic, the area of myocardium at further risk of becoming necrotic, and the patency of the infarct-related artery. Echocardiography is a low-cost, safe, bedside, repeatable tool, particularly useful for prognostic stratification after myocardial injury. Two-dimensional echocardiography analyzes left ventricular function, the most powerful predictor of survival immediately after acute myocardial infarction. Myocardial contrast echocardiography measures the infarct size and detects viable myocardium. Stress echocardiography stratifies patients with viable myocardium and/or multivessel coronary artery disease who need further diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Transthoracic coronary Doppler ultrasonography assesses effective recanalization and coronary flow reserve of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Further technologic advances are needed to allow direct noninvasive measurement of flow by transthoracic Doppler ultrasonography in other coronary arteries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pizzuto et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: