Why the study?
Does transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy improve long-term outcomes compared to surgical myectomy in patients with symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy?
Does transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy improve long-term outcomes compared to surgical myectomy in patients with symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy?
Transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy offers similar long-term symptom resolution and mortality compared to surgical myectomy in symptomatic HOCM, despite a higher rate of repeat procedures.
May support TASH consideration in select HOCM cases; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm equivalence.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy (TASH) with open surgical myomectomy (SM) in patients with symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent either procedure at our institution. The demographics, clinical outcomes, echocardiographic parameters, and complications were compared. RESULTS: Seventy patients with HOCM were treated with either TASH (n = 47, 26 male) or SM (n = 23, 10 male). Compared to those treated with SM, patients undergoing TASH were older (57+/- 14.7 years versus 47 +/- 20.6 years, P = 0.021) and more symptomatic. A higher proportion of patients had syncope as a presenting feature in the TASH group compared to the SM group (57.5% vs. 17.4%, P = 0.002) respectively. They were also more likely to be in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV compared to the patients who underwent SM (85.1% vs. 39.1%; P < 0.001). Patients were followed for a mean period of 43 months (TASH) and 46 months (SM). Repeat procedures were more common in the TASH group (17% vs. 0%, P = 0.04) but mitral valve replacement was more common in the SM group (0% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.105). Symptom improvement, the rate of complications and all cause mortality rates were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: TASH compares favorably with surgical myectomy with regard to symptom resolution, rate of complications and mortality in a tertiary referral centre and should be seen as an attractive alternative to surgical myectomy in the appropriate patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samardhi et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: