Why the study?
To investigate the correlation between time in range and the risk of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy development in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Does time in range (TIR) correlate with the incidence of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Does time in range (TIR) correlate with the incidence of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Lower time in range on continuous glucose monitoring is an independent risk factor for the development of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Lower TIR was associated with higher CAN risk in T2DM; leaves open whether targeting TIR alters incidence.
Purpose: To investigate the correlation between time in range (TIR) and the risk of cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) development in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Patients and Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) hospitalized and followed at the Department of Endocrinology, Hefei Hospital of Anhui Medical University, between September 2020 and July 2024. All participants underwent standardized cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) assessment via the Ewing test, and time in range (TIR) was derived from baseline continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CAN incidence, adjusted for relevant covariates. Results: Over a median follow-up of 25.0 months, 123 of 196 participants (62.8%) were diagnosed with CAN. The CAN group exhibited longer diabetes duration, lower time in range (TIR) and body mass index (BMI), higher time above range (TAR), mean glucose (MG), urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), and higher insulin use rates. Participants with low TIR were older, had longer diabetes duration, and displayed: 1. Higher fasting plasma glucose (FPG), HbA1c, and LDL-C levels; 2. Elevated glycemic variability (MAGE, CV, LAGE, SD, MG, TAR) via continuous glucose monitoring (CGM); 3. Greater likelihood of insulin therapy. All differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Multivariable Cox regression analyses, adjusted for key covariates (eg, age, HbA1c, insulin use), demonstrated an inverse association between TIR and CAN incidence. Conclusion: Lower TIR is an independent risk factor for CAN in T2DM patients, with higher TIR levels associated with reduced CAN risk (P < 0.05).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: