Key result
In patients with type 2 diabetes, a time in range (TIR) <70% was associated with a higher incidence of definite cardiac autonomic neuropathy compared to TIR >70% (42.9% vs. 14.3%).
Why the study?
Time in range is emerging as an independent risk factor for diabetic complications, motivating evaluation of its association with cardiac autonomic neuropathy in type 2 diabetes patients.
Is lower time in range (TIR) associated with a higher prevalence of cardiac autonomic neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cross-Sectional (n=42)
Is lower time in range (TIR) associated with a higher prevalence of cardiac autonomic neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Lower time in range on continuous glucose monitoring may be associated with a higher prevalence and severity of cardiac autonomic neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes.
May warrant closer neuropathy screening in low-TIR patients; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation before practice change.
Introduction: Time in range (TIR), a metric of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides better information regarding the individual's glycemic variability than a static measure like glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). TIR is emerging as an independent risk factor for diabetic complications, both microvascular and macrovascular complications independent of HbA1c. Hence, this study evaluates the association between TIR and cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) in type 2 diabetic patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 42 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were enrolled in this study and underwent a 3-day CGM using the "FreeStyle Libre Pro Flash Glucose Monitoring System Sensor" along with tests for CAN within the 3 days of attaching the CGM. Results: Out of 42 patients, 36 patients (85.7%) were diagnosed with CAN (early CAN 57.1% and definite CAN 28.6%) and the mean TIR was 64.4% ±23.5%. Out of those with TIR <70%, 42.9% were affected with definite CAN compared to only 14.3% among those with TIR >70%. Patients with more severe CAN were found to have a lower TIR (P = 0.115). Conclusion: The study found a high prevalence of cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) of around 85.7% in type 2 diabetes patients. Lower TIR values were associated with a higher incidence of definite CAN (42.9% vs. 14.3% in TIR <70% vs. >70% groups). The findings suggest TIR is inversely associated with the presence and severity of cardiac autonomic neuropathy in type 2 diabetic patients and also a potential link between TIR and CAN severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karthikeyan et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=42). Time in range (TIR) <70% vs. Time in range (TIR) >70% was evaluated on Definite cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) (p=0.115). In patients with type 2 diabetes, a time in range (TIR) <70% was associated with a higher incidence of definite cardiac autonomic neuropathy compared to TIR >70% (42.9% vs. 14.3%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: