Why the study?
Does continuous intravenous epoprostenol improve survival and exercise tolerance in children with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Does continuous intravenous epoprostenol improve survival and exercise tolerance in children with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Continuous IV epoprostenol improves survival and exercise tolerance in childhood IPAH, though pulmonary vascular resistance may remain high, suggesting a role for add-on therapy like sildenafil.
Home epoprostenol infusion may yield high transplant-free survival in pediatric IPAH; leaves open randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: There is little data on the long-term effects of continuous intravenous epoprostenol for children with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) in Japan. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-one IPAH patients younger than 18 years old who had begun epoprostenol therapy at Toho University Omori Medical Center between January 1999 and June 2004 were reviewed. During a mean follow up of 3.4 years, the rate of those who survived or did not undergo a lung transplantation among the 27 patients who received home infusion therapy of epoprostenol was 100% at 1 year, 96.3% at 2 years, and 79.4% at 3 years. In 82% of survivors, the World Health Organization functional class was changed from III or IV to II according to improvements in the plasma brain natriuretic peptide level and the distance walked in 6 min during the follow-up period. In most cases, mean pulmonary artery pressure and the ratio of pulmonary to systemic vascular resistance remained high, although the cardiac index had improved to within a normal range 1 year after the initiation of epoprostenol. Therefore, sildenafil was administered as an additional therapy to 16 patients who presented with sustained severe PAH. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous IV epoprostenol certainly improves survival and exercise tolerance in childhood IPAH, although the improvement of pulmonary vascular resistance regardless of long-term epoprostenol therapy is insufficient. Therefore, the addition of a new drug, such as sildenafil, is recommended to be administered in adjunction with epoprostenol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakayama et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: