Why the study?
Despite known carfilzomib-induced cardiotoxicity, no validated risk prediction models for adverse cardiovascular events in a real-life population were available.
The HFA-ICOS score showed limited discriminatory power for predicting Carfilzomib-induced cardiotoxicity in multiple myeloma patients, but its performance improved when integrated with systolic blood pressure and pulse wave velocity.
HFA-ICOS score performance for carfilzomib cardiotoxicity in MM remains unproven; prospective validation studies needed.
Background: Despite the inference about the cardiotoxicity induced by Carfilzomib, no validated risk prediction models for adverse cardiovascular events in a real-life population are available. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the risk stratification score for Carfilzomib-induced cardiotoxicity of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology and the International Cardio-Oncology Society (HFA-ICOS) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Methods: This is a prospective, real-world study including MM patients consecutively enrolled prior to starting Carfilzomib, divided into levels of risk according to the HFA-ICOS proforma. Results: Of 169 patients, 11.8% were classified as ‘low risk’, 38.5% as ‘medium risk’, 45.6% as ‘high risk’ and 4.1% as ‘very high risk’ at baseline. A total of 89 (52.7%) patients experienced one of the following events: 36 (21.3%) had at least one cardiovascular event and 77 (45.6%) had almost one hypertension-related event. No significant differences were observed for the incidence of any cardiovascular events between the different levels of risk (p > 0.05), even considering the HFA-ICOS score as a continuous variable. The integration of the score with the baseline systolic blood pressure and pulse wave velocity enhanced the accuracy of the score (AUC 0.557 vs. 0.736). Conclusions: The HFA-ICOS score did not discriminate between patients at low, medium and high risk, showing a limited discriminatory power in predicting the risk of events in our population. The integration of other parameters in the HFA-ICOS score, such as systolic blood pressure and pulse wave velocity, improved the performance of the score.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Astarita et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: