Why the study?
Do P wave duration on SAECG and P wave dispersion on standard ECG predict the development of atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Do P wave duration on SAECG and P wave dispersion on standard ECG predict the development of atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
P wave duration > 125 ms on SAECG and P wave dispersion > 25 ms on standard ECG measured early in AMI are independent predictors of subsequent atrial fibrillation.
P-wave metrics may aid AF risk stratification in AMI; leaves open whether they guide monitoring or prophylaxis.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a frequent complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), with reported incidence of 7% to 18%. The incidence of congestive heart failure, in-hospital mortality, and long-term mortality is higher in AMI patients with AF than in AMI patients without AF. P wave duration on signal-averaged ECG (PWD) and P wave dispersion on standard ECG (Pd) are noninvasive markers of intra-atrial conduction disturbances, which are believed to be the main electrophysiological cause of AF. METHODS: In the present study we investigated prospectively whether P wave duration on SAECG and P wave dispersion on standard ECG can predict development of AF in a group of patients with AMI. One hundred and thirty patients (100 men and 30 women, aged 56.9 +/- 12) with AMI were investigated. PWD, Pd, their clinical and hemodynamic characteristics were collected. RESULTS: During the observation up to 14 days, 22 patients (16.9%) developed AF. Univariate analysis variables associated with development of AF: age > 65 years, Killip class III-IV, PWD > 125 ms, and Pd > 25 ms. Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that age > 65 years, PWD > 125 ms, and Pd > 25 ms were independently associated with AF. CONCLUSIONS: PWD and Pd both measured in a very early period of AMI are useful in predicting AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosiak et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: