Why the study?
Dose-dependent passaging to adapt oncolytic Coxsackievirus B3 to resistant colorectal cancer cells is time-consuming, limiting clinical applicability.
Volume-based passaging is a faster method to generate tumor cell-specific adapted oncolytic Coxsackievirus B3 for resistant colorectal cancer cells.
Volume-based passaging may accelerate CVB3 adaptation; leaves open clinical-grade manufacturing feasibility.
Recently, we demonstrated that the oncolytic Coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) strain PD-H can be efficiently adapted to resistant colorectal cancer cells through dose-dependent passaging in colorectal cancer cells. However, the method is time-consuming, which limits its clinical applicability. Here, we investigated whether the manufacturing time of the adapted virus can be reduced by replacing the dose-based passaging with volume-based passaging. For this purpose, the murine colorectal carcinoma cell line MC38, resistant to PD-H-induced lysis, was initially infected with PD-H at 0.1 multiplicity of infection (MOI). For subsequent passages, 15-30 µL of a 1:10 dilution of the cell culture supernatant was transferred to fresh MC38 cells early after virus-induced cell lysis became visible. By virus passage 10, complete cell lysis of MC38 cells was achieved. Sequencing of the passage 10 virus (P-10) revealed two nucleotide substitutions in the 5' UTR and six amino acid changes in the viral polyprotein compared to the PD-H founder. P-10, however, consisted of a heterogeneous virus population. Therefore, the detected mutations were introduced into the cDNA of PD-H, from which the recombinant virus PD-MC38 was generated. PD-MC38 exhibited significantly enhanced replication and lytic activity in MC38 cells compared to PD-H, whereas its oncolytic activity in other colorectal cancer cell lines was comparable to or even lower than that of PD-H. These findings demonstrate that volume-based passaging is suitable to generate tumor cell-specific adapted PD-H. Moreover, compared to the dose-dependent passaging, volume-based passaging significantly reduced the time required to generate the adapted virus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elsner et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: