Why the study?
Does the D/S ratio accurately indicate cardiac perfusion reserve and correlate with cardiovascular disease severity?
Does the D/S ratio accurately indicate cardiac perfusion reserve and correlate with cardiovascular disease severity?
The D/S ratio is proposed as a simple, non-invasive marker of myocardial perfusion reserve that correlates with heart failure severity and may be useful for cardiovascular disease screening.
May support D/S ratio for pre-eclampsia screening; leaves open prospective validation as perfusion marker.
Background: Since the greater part of coronary blood flow takes place during the diastolic phase of each cardiac cycle, a time indicator of myocardial perfusion reserve, the ratio of diastolic to systolic duration (D/S ratio), was presented. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and precision, the biological implication, and the applications of D/S ratio. Methods: Multi-center pragmatic studies evaluating the time indicator of cardiac perfusion reserve were performed. Related experiments, clinical trials, and surveys were conducted at 5 centers. Results: The results showed that the measurement of D/S ratio is both accurate and precise; the mean values of D/S of all of the 3 species studied (human, rabbit, and rat) were greater than 1. These application studies on D/S ratio showed that a close negative correlation existed between D/S ratio and New York Heart Association Functional Classification (NYHA FC) (r = –0.659, p pregnant women with pre-eclampsia and either normal pregnant women or non-pregnant women were significant (p Conclusions: D/S ratio has important biological implication, which is a safe, easy, reliable, and effective indicator, can be used to evaluate fitness levels, served as a pathophysiological marker for screening of cardiovascular disease (CVD), for predicting risk of cardiac events, and for evaluating the severity and prognosis of CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiong et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: