Key result
D/S ratio linked to ~393% higher odds of CHF phenotypes and correlates closely with LVEF.
Why the study?
To evaluate the correlation between the ratio of diastolic to systolic durations and echocardiographic parameters in chronic heart failure, and whether it can help classify heart failure phenotypes.
Does the ratio of diastolic to systolic durations (D/S) correlate with echocardiographic parameters and accurately classify heart failure phenotypes in patients with chronic heart failure?
Cross-Sectional (n=122)
Does the ratio of diastolic to systolic durations (D/S) correlate with echocardiographic parameters and accurately classify heart failure phenotypes in patients with chronic heart failure?
The ratio of diastolic to systolic durations measured by digital phonocardiography correlates strongly with LVEF and can serve as a noninvasive supplementary indicator for classifying heart failure phenotypes.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the correlation between the ratio of diastolic to systolic durations (D/S) and echocardiographic parameters of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and evaluate whether the D/S can be used as a supplementary biomarker for the classification of heart failure (HF) phenotypes. METHODS: In total, 122 CHF patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%, 40%≤LVEF<50%, or ≥50% were categorized as having HF with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (N=32), HF with a mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) (N=21) or HF with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (N=69), respectively. All patients underwent echocardiography for assessment of nineteen structural and functional echocardiographic parameters and digital phonocardiography for the measurement of D/S. Spearman correlation was used to analyse the associations between the D/S and echocardiographic parameters. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the associations between the D/S and HF phenotypes, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was employed to evaluate the predictive value of the D/S in the classification of HF phenotypes. RESULTS: The D/S values of patients with HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF were 1.32±0.06, 1.44±0.11 and 1.54±0.08, respectively, which were significantly different (All P<0.05). A close correlation between the D/S and LVEF was found (r=0.777, P<0.001). The multivariate analysis indicated that the D/S was an independent risk factor for CHF phenotypes (OR=4.927, 95% CI 2.532-9.587; P<0.001). The area under the ROC curve for distinguishing between HFmrEF and HFpEF using the D/S was 0.764 (95% CI 0.707-0.845; P < 0.001) and that for distinguishing between HFmrEF and HFrEF using the D/S was 0.821 (95% CI 0.755-0.882; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The D/S was significantly associated with LVEF, and as LVEF decreased, the D/S tended to decrease, which could also serve as a noninvasive supplementary indicator for detecting systolic and diastolic dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic heart failure (CHF) (n=122). Ratio of diastolic to systolic durations (D/S) was evaluated on Classification of CHF phenotypes (OR 4.927, 95% CI 2.532-9.587, p=<0.001). The ratio of diastolic to systolic durations (D/S) was an independent risk factor for CHF phenotypes (OR 4.927; 95% CI 2.532-9.587; P<0.001) and closely correlated with LVEF (r=0.777, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: