Key result
Pulmonary venous flow Doppler assessment, specifically the S/D integral ratio, independently predicted heart failure readmissions beyond routine diastolic grading.
Why the study?
Does pulmonary venous flow Doppler assessment provide prognostic value for survival and heart failure readmission in patients with preserved ejection fraction?
Cohort (n=365)
Does pulmonary venous flow Doppler assessment provide prognostic value for survival and heart failure readmission in patients with preserved ejection fraction?
Pulmonary venous flow parameters, particularly the S/D integral ratio, provide independent prognostic value for heart failure readmission in patients with preserved ejection fraction beyond routine diastolic grading.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid HF readmission risk stratification in HFpEF beyond standard grading; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
AIMS: To evaluate the prognostic role of pulmonary venous flow parameters and their role in patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Pulmonary venous flow parameters were measured in 365 patients in sinus rhythm, without significant mitral disease, and EF >50% (age 64.9 ± 19; 52% female) by a single sonographer. Survival, time to re-admission for heart failure, and to a combined cardiac end point (cardiac death, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation) were retrospectively analysed and correlated to echo parameters. Systolic (S) and diastolic (D) pulmonary vein flow were obtainable in 73% of patients and Ar in 65%. The lower peak S/D ratio and higher ΔAr-A time were associated with higher rate of heart failure readmission (P = 0.03 for both). The S/D integral ratio was the best pulmonary vein flow predictor of heart failure readmissions (P = 0.0009), better than the peak S/D ratio, or ΔA-Ar time (P < 0.01 for both), and independently predicted worse outcome even when adjusted for diastolic grading (using recent guidelines), left ventricle mass index, E/e', and left atrial volume index (P < 0.05 for all). The addition S/D ratio to diastolic grading recognized patients with pseudo-normal filling pattern and S/D ratio >1 with similar clinical outcomes to grade I (P > 0.5), but worse clinical outcomes than in the pseudo-normal patients with lower S/D ratio (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: PVFP are obtainable in most patients, add prognostic information on top of routine diastolic parameters, and define an early stage of diastolic dysfunction resembling the pseudo-normal pattern in which S/D ratio is >1, and outcome is excellent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buffle et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Preserved ejection fraction (n=365). Pulmonary venous flow Doppler assessment was evaluated on Survival, time to re-admission for heart failure, and a combined cardiac end point (cardiac death, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation) (p=0.0009). Pulmonary venous flow Doppler assessment, specifically the S/D integral ratio, independently predicted heart failure readmissions beyond routine diastolic grading.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: