Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We compared two collection devices, IsoCode and FTA, with whole blood for the diagnosis of malaria by PCR (n = 100). Using whole blood as the reference standard, both devices were sensitive for the detection of single-species malaria infections by PCR (> or =96%). However, the detection of mixed infections was suboptimal (IsoCode was 42% sensitive, and FTA was 63% sensitive).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhong et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: