Computational complexity study demonstrates logarithmic inapproximability bounds for extremal vertex deletion in graphs, highlighting precise algorithmic limits across graph classes.
In this paper, we investigate the approximability of two node deletion. Given a vertex weighted graph $G=(V,E)$ and a specified, or"distinguished" vertex p \∈ V, MDD(min) is the problem of finding a minimum vertex set S \⊆ V\ \\\ such that p becomes the degree vertex in G[V \ S]; and MDD(max) is the problem of a minimum weight vertex set S \⊆ V\ \\\ such that becomes the maximum degree vertex in G[V \ S]. These are known$NP$-complete problems and have been studied from the parameterized complexity of view in previous work. Here, we prove that for any \ε > 0, the problems cannot be approximated within a factor (1 - \ε)log, unless NP \⊆ DTIME(nloglog n). We also show that for any\ε > 0, MDD(min) cannot be approximated within a factor (1-\ε)log n on bipartite graphs, unless NP \⊆ DTIME(nloglog), and that for any \ε > 0, MDD(max) cannot be approximated within a (1/2 - \ε)log n on bipartite graphs, unless NP \⊆(nloglog n). We give an O(log n) factor approximation algorithm MDD(max) on general graphs, provided the degree of p is O(log n). We show that if the degree of p is n-O(log n), a similar result holds MDD(min). We prove that MDD(max) is $APX$-complete on 3-regular unweighted and provide an approximation algorithm with ratio $1.583$ when G is a3-regular unweighted graph. In addition, we show that MDD(min) can be solved in time when G is a regular graph of constant degree.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mishra et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: