Why the study?
Does traditional resistance training compared to cardio exercise produce different acute physiological responses when effort and duration are matched in healthy males?
Does traditional resistance training compared to cardio exercise produce different acute physiological responses when effort and duration are matched in healthy males?
When effort and duration are matched, resistance training and cardio exercise produce largely similar acute physiological responses in healthy males.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Small crossover study of acute responses; leaves open differential physiological effects of resistance versus cardio modalities.
The present study examined the effects of exercise utilising traditional resistance training (leg press) or ‘cardio’ exercise (recumbent cycle ergometry) modalities upon acute physiological responses. Nine healthy males underwent a within session randomised crossover design where they completed both the leg press and recumbent cycle ergometer conditions. Conditions were approximately matched for effort and duration (leg press: 4 x 12RM, recumbent cycle ergometer: 4 x 60 second sprints). Measurements included VO2, respiratory exchange ratio (RER), blood lactate, energy expenditure, muscle swelling, and electromyography. Perceived effort was similar between conditions and thus both were well matched with respect to effort. There were no significant effects by ‘condition’ in any of the physiological responses examined (all p > 0.05). The present study shows that, when both effort and duration are matched, resistance training and ‘cardio’ exercise produce largely similar physiological responses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steele et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: